Qinwen Zheng vs Emma Raducanu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Jun at 05:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Q. Zheng vs E. Raducanu

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: Zheng 1 - 0 Raducanu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Qinwen Zheng winning 2 and Emma Raducanu winning 0. The last match between Qinwen Zheng and Emma Raducanu was at the LTA London Championships - London, 13-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Grass, with Qinwen Zheng getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Zheng | 1 |
Raducanu | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(QF) LTA London Championships - London(06-13-25)
Q. Zheng vs E. Raducanu H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$6,864,924 | Career Prize Money | $5,161,382 |
69.89% (246-106) | Career Total W/L | 64.63% (148-81) |
1 | Grass | 0 |
14 | Titles | 4 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
63.33% (19-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.70% (27-19) |
Q. Zheng vs E. Raducanu Match Preview
- Second Serve Performance: Zheng has a notable edge with 41.81% of points won on their second serve in recent months, compared to Raducanu's 36.08%. Why is this important? Second serve performance often correlates with match outcomes.
- Return Game Stats: Raducanu slightly edges Zheng by winning 51.44% vs. 51.06% of opponents' second serve points. However, Zheng excels in second serve returns with 28.26%, trailing behind Raducanu's 33.25% on first serve returns. Which factor could be more decisive?
- Under Pressure Analysis: On breakpoints, Raducanu shows a higher save rate of 45.59%, compared to Zheng's 43.64%. Can this be a decisive factor in tight moments?
- Overall Performance: Analyzing the last year's results, Zheng has a higher win rate of 74.63% against Raducanu's 61.36%. Could this suggest an upper hand for Zheng?
- Surface Preference: Zheng dominates on Clay with a 76% win rate, though struggles on Grass. Raducanu performs best on Hard courts with a 68% win rate. Will the surface impact their performance here?
- Tournament Experience: Zheng has played more high-level matches at the Masters series with a higher win rate, 66.67%. Raducanu, playing primarily on the Main tour, sits at 56.25%. Does this level of competition influence predictions?
- Opponent Quality: Zheng competes against tougher opponents with an average rank of 55.15 compared to Raducanu's 62.02, potentially giving Zheng the upper hand through experience.
- Deciding Sets: With Zheng winning 76% of deciding sets versus Raducanu's 43%, how pivotal could this be if the match extends?
- Break Point Conversion: Zheng slightly outperforms with a 41.46% conversion rate on break opportunities. Marginal but potentially crucial.
Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent form, second serve performance plays a significant role in overall match success. Zheng, outperforming Raducanu in this area, secures a critical advantage.
Return game prowess also favors Raducanu slightly, yet Zheng's consistent advantage across surfaces indicates a potential upper hand.
The competitive experience at higher-level events provides Zheng with an edge, showcasing adaptability and skill against quality opponents.
Zheng's resilience in deciding sets underlines a mental fortitude likely crucial in high-stakes scenarios.
Given these factors, Zheng appears likely to claim victory in the forthcoming encounter.
Qinwen Zheng vs Emma Raducanu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Q. Zheng vs E. Raducanu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:49:52 | Avg. Match Time | 1:49:52 |
56% (39/70) | 1st Serve % | 65% (41/63) |
74% (29/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (24/41) |
39% (12/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
33% (5/15) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
49% (31/63) | Return Pts Won % | 41% (29/70) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Q. Zheng Recent Matches Played
E. Raducanu Recent Matches Played

Q. Zheng vs E. Raducanu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
69.89% (246/106) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.63% (148/81) |
65.07% (531/285) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.73% (325/185) |
56.70% (4219/3222) | Games Win/Loss | 55.75% (2592/2057) |
68.13% (124/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.63% (94/45) |
75.83% (91/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (16/12) |
74.29% (26/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (20/10) |
33.33% (5/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 56.25% (18/14) |
0.53 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
1906 | Aces Total | 671 |
0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
1553 | Total Double Faults | 752 |
1:41:31 | Average Match Time | 1:39:51 |
294.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 264.1 |
52% (11872/22858) | 1st Serve % | 65% (9821/15053) |
73% (8655/11872) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6428/9821) |
46% (5016/10988) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2429/5231) |
49% (1390/2836) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (920/1914) |
45% (10579/23274) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6980/15197) |
69.39% (34/15) | Slam W/L | 65.12% (28/15) |
60.00% (45/30) | Masters W/L | 52.38% (22/20) |
75.00% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 85.71% (6/1) |
68.89% (62/28) | Main Tour W/L | 52.54% (31/28) |
78.13% (75/21) | Challenger W/L | 73.58% (39/14) |
71.05% (27/11) | Futures W/L | 88.00% (22/3) |
70% (242/346) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (146/219) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
55% (40/73) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (32/53) |
64% (73/114) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (30/58) |
91% (232/210) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (152/136) |
9% (232/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (152/15) |
30% (120/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (77/13) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
